Make 3 interest-free payments. 
The HOKA Bondi and HOKA Clifton Running Shoes are two of HOKA’s most popular models. Even though it’s fair to say the Bondi are the original max-cushioned running shoes, the Clifton have arguably become more popular. This could be a result of both fashion trends and what runners are looking for.
HOKA Clifton 10 Running Shoes at top of picture. HOKA Bondi 9 Running Shoes at bottom of picture.
This article explains the differences between the HOKA Bondi 9 and HOKA Clifton 10 Running Shoes. - the two latest editions. Our original Bondi versus Clifton article was very popular, so hopefully this content continues to answer your questions.
Key features comparison
HOKA Bondi cushioning vs Clifton cushioning
The Bondi and Clifton have different midsole foams. The Bondi midsole is made with a super critical foam. In contrast, the Clifton feature a compression moulded EVA foam. This means the Bondi cushioning is both softer and more energy returning than the Clifton cushioning.
As the Bondi midsole stack is higher than the Clifton, it feels more padded underfoot. Even though the Clifton midsole is still relatively thick, it offers a slightly more connected feel. There’s also a difference in the drop. When the Bondi 9 were updated, the entire stack went up 2 mm. However, when the Clifton 10 were updated, only the heel stack went up 3 mm. This means the Bondi have a 5 mm drop and the Clifton have a 8 mm drop.
HOKA Bondi 9 Running Shoes at top of picture. HOKA Clifton 10 Running Shoes at bottom of picture.
Both models feature HOKA’s smooth MetaRocker™ geometry. This simply means the midsole is curved from heel-to-toe. The main benefit of this design is that it helps roll your feet forward and can therefore reduce the load on your working muscles - particularly the calf muscles.
As there’s a difference in the heel-to-toe drop, the rocker geometry feels slightly different. However, it’s not that one is better than the other. And your biomechanics will likely determine which one you prefer. It’s not possible to say that one is better suited to a particular runner than the other.
Run performance
As you’d probably expect, the Bondi offers a much softer and plusher ride than the Clifton. As the super critical foam offers more energy return, it also feels bouncier. This is an interesting dynamic, as while the Clifton are lighter and more responsive than the Bondi, the Bondi arguably feel better at steadier paces. However, you might be the type of runner who enjoys a firmer ride when you pick up the pace.
Overall, the Bondi cushioning will feel best when you’re looking for maximum protection and lots of cushioning. In contrast, the Clifton cushioning will feel best when you’re looking for a protective, yet responsive ride.
Which model offers more support?
In terms of support, both the Bondi and Clifton are neutral running shoes, but both models offer a good level of support. This is thanks to the rearfoot-focused Active FootFrame™. To explain further, the sides of the midsole foam rise up at the rearfoot and cradle the feet. This improves the inherent stability of the midsole.
It will vary from runner to runner, but it’s likely the Bondi offer slightly more support than the Clifton. This is because the width of the base-nets of the Bondi are broader - making the midsole inherently more stable. Additionally, because the midsole is slightly thicker, it feels more supportive during longer-distance runs or on the days when your legs are tired. For example, the day after a higher-intensity interval session.
Do they fit the same?
From a fit perspective, while the Clifton 10 Running Shoes offer a more accommodating fit than the previous version, the Bondi still offers a more generous fit. The toe box in the Bondi feels slightly more spacious and it doesn’t feel as snug as the Clifton around the midfoot. So, if you’re looking for more space for your feet to splay, you probably want to choose the Bondi Running Shoes.
If you have slightly narrower feet, or enjoy a more fitted feel, you probably want to choose the Clifton Running Shoes. You can obviously opt for the wide-fit version in the HOKA Clifton if you would like more space though.
HOKA Bondi 9 Running Shoes on left of picture. HOKA Clifton 10 Running Shoes on right of picture.
Interestingly, the Clifton upper feels slightly softer than the Bondi upper. This is down to the fact that the Clifton has a premium jacquard knit material, and the Bondi has an engineered mesh. The Bondi does feature more padding around the heel collar though - which offers great comfort. Both models have a tapered back heel counter - making it easier to slip the shoes on and off.
Is one more durable than the other?
When it comes to durability, the Bondi should last longer than the Clifton. This is down to two factors. Firstly, the super critical foam should be more durable than the CMEVA foam.
HOKA Bondi 9 Running Shoes at top of picture. HOKA Clifton 10 Running Shoes at bottom of picture.
There’s also slightly more outsole rubber on the bottom of the Bondi. However, it’s worth noting that the Clifton 10 Running Shoes should be more durable than the previous version. This is mainly a result of the extra cushioning in the heel.
How to choose between the HOKA Bondi and Clifton
Hopefully it’s clear the main difference comes down to the cushioning. The HOKA Bondi Running Shoes offer a more cushioned and energetic ride. As a result, the Bondi helps take more stress off your legs than the Clifton. This means the Bondi should be the better option for long runs and recovery days. However, you may also prefer this experience for your everyday miles.
Everyone is different though. You might prefer a more responsive ride, irrespective of what speed or distance you’re running. If that’s the case, then the Clifton are likely to be the better choice for you. And while we’re saying the Clifton aren’t as cushioned as the Bondi, the Clifton Running Shoes still offer a lot of protection for daily miles.
Naturally, you could have a place for both models in your shoe rotation. The Bondi and Clifton are similar enough that a lot of runners will be able to transition between each model with no issues. But, there’s enough of a difference that you could find each model is better suited to a specific pace or distance. Additionally, if you do your everyday miles in the Clifton, you might notice a bigger benefit when you use the more cushioned Bondi on your longer runs and recovery days.
Which model is better for walking?
A lot of people visit us at Run4It looking for HOKA Running Shoes for walking. This is often off the back of a recommendation from a podiatrist. If you’re wondering why, it’s because the curved midsole geometry helps roll your feet forward when walking. This can help reduce the amount of work done by the foot and ankle. In a lot of cases, this can alleviate plantar fascia discomfort and Achilles tendon problems. Some people might find the rocker can reduce pain in the big toe joint because it's not flexing as much.
While both models can be very good options for walking, it’s likely the HOKA Clifton are more suitable than the HOKA Bondi. This is because the Clifton are slightly lighter and you’re likely to be less aware of them on your feet. If you have a Morton’s neuroma, the HOKA Clifton 10 Wide Running Shoes should be the better option.
